I imagine this was a particularly dirty explosion, throwing dark dust clouds and obscuring large patches of a dense starfield. If you look closely, there is a gritty quality to the image.
I imagine this was a particularly dirty explosion, throwing dark dust clouds and obscuring large patches of a dense starfield. If you look closely, there is a gritty quality to the image.
I managed to frame it better this time. Here’s an annotated version:
IC342 is a large, bright, nearby galaxy that would be “naked to the invisible eye” if it weren’t for the dust in the way.
Here’s a five-minute exposure, with a gratuitous satellite:
Do you see a galaxy? Maybe if you squint and sacrifice a pint of Haagen-Dazs?
But curiosity — perhaps more exposures could tease out something?
Here are 41 images like the above, stacked up and combined:
It looks like a galaxy! I should note that these images were taken on a night with excess moonshine, in hazy suburban skies.
Three of the 41 exposures had satellite trails, but they disappeared in the average.
There is an overall red tint to the photo. It’s probably not natural, but rather an artifact of the anti-pollution filter I am using.
The cluster extends widely past this field of view. Poor framing — if I had tilted the camera I could have included more of it, and the “chain” moniker would have been more obvious.
Well, I managed to collect a few more photons from NGC3718, and the result is marginally better. Marginally: the black of space is a bit smoother:
I can skip over to Google and find a hundred images of this object with more color and detail, but the process of collecting light in the cold dark yourself makes it all real.
I collected all of the sub-images during bright moonlight. Maybe in a week or two, I will post a better rendition. This picture has just a hint of whispy spiral arms at the edges, which I might be able to capture.
Was this deliberate? I don’t remember. Something was moving, and something wasn’t.